Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is a bit better than Galaxy A22's overall score of 76.1. Google Pixel 3's construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than Galaxy A22, even though it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better processor than Galaxy A22. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2160px. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a lot less mega pixels back facing camera, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A22 has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A22 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 3 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.