Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than the Galaxy A22, getting an 80.7 score against 76.1. The Google Pixel 3 XL body is a little thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy A22, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a better looking display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A22 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A22 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better processor than Galaxy A22. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.