Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22, with a score of 81.9 against 76.1. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4 is older than the Samsung Galaxy A22, it's design is a bit thinner and lighter. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a much greater count of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A22 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A22 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 4 features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way worse 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Google Pixel 4 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.