Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is just a bit better than the Galaxy A22, having an 82.9 score against 76.1. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. The Google Pixel 4a body is a bit thinner and a lot lighter than Galaxy A22, despite of the fact that it was released just 11 months before.
The Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a way greater display pixel density.
Galaxy A22 has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 4a features a superior battery life than Galaxy A22. Google Pixel 4a takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light situations and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.