Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is better than Galaxy A22's score of 76.1. Even when the Google Pixel 5 and the Galaxy A22 were only released with a few months difference, the Google Pixel 5 is lighter and a little thinner. Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy A22 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 5 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy A22. The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.