Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-07-02 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A22, getting a global score of 77 against 76.1. LG G7 Fit's body is lighter and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G7 Fit has a more recent 8.1 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12, providing you a couple additional features and increased performance.
Galaxy A22 has just a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A22 also has a higher number of cores (but slower). The LG G7 Fit has a much sharper display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixels number per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG G7 Fit captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or video in low light situations and a much worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A22 has a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
LG G7 Fit counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.