Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-07-02 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy A22, with an 82.5 score against 76.1. These devices have Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version, so it provides you lots of additional features and optimized performance. LG V30S ThinQ's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy A22, although it was released 3 years before.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a way better pixels density. LG V30S ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A22, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A22. The LG V30S ThinQ takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.