Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A22, having a general score of 81.3 against 76.1. LG V35 ThinQ is an much older phone than Samsung Galaxy A22, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. LG V35 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a lot better screen density. LG V35 ThinQ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a back camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.