Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy A22, with an 81.2 score against 76.1. The LG V40 ThinQ is an notably older device than the Galaxy A22, but LG was able to build it just a little thinner and a bit lighter anyway. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ features a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a way higher pixels quantity per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG V40 ThinQ features more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
LG V40 ThinQ captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.