Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than the Galaxy A22, with a global score of 87.1 against 76.1. Even though LG Velvet is older than Galaxy A22, it's construction is a bit thinner and a little lighter. LG Velvet has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a little bit bigger display, more pixels per display inch and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460.
LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Velvet features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM.
LG Velvet counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and a 48 mega-pixels resolution camera, the LG Velvet also has a way higher (4K) video definition. The LG Velvet has a much better battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.