Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than Samsung Galaxy A22, having a general score of 89.6 against 76.1. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola edge has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. The Motorola edge construction is older, a little heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A22.
The Motorola edge has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola edge counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A22, because it has a little larger screen, a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Motorola edge shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola edge also has a lot better (4K) video definition and a much more megapixels back camera. Motorola edge features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola edge has a really longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.