Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Galaxy A22, getting a general score of 87.1 against 76.1. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12, so it provides some additional features and optimized performance. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is incredibly newer, but just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A22.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a better display density, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A22 features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, because it has a higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.