Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than Galaxy A22, having an 80.7 score against 76.1. Motorola One Vision is a much older and a bit thicker cellphone than the Galaxy A22, but Motorola managed to build it a little lighter anyway. The Motorola One Vision has a little better processing power than Galaxy A22. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola One Vision counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a much higher display pixel density. The Motorola One Vision has slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22. Motorola One Vision has a lot better camera than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a 48 megapixels camera in the back, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.