Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the Galaxy A22, with a score of 87 against 76.1. The Motorola razr (2020) body is a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A22, although it's just a bit heavier and was released about 9 months before. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 876 x 2142 and a higher screen density.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos and a lot better (4K) video definition. Motorola razr (2020) has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.