Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S is slightly better than Galaxy A22, having a 76.2 score against 76.1. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the nubia Red Magic 5S has the older 10 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. The nubia Red Magic 5S is an older, heavier and thicker cellphone than Galaxy A22.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a higher display pixel density and a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A22 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
The nubia Red Magic 5S takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.