Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is better than Galaxy A22, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 76.1. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12. The Galaxy A51 construction is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy A22, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a better display than Galaxy A22, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater pixels density and a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy A51 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A22. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a very superior camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a lot better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a slightly better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A51 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.