Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A22's 76.1 score. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing here, the Galaxy A51 5G is an older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a more vivid display than Galaxy A22, because it has a little bigger display, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A51 5G features a better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A22, because although it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.