Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A22, getting a global score of 85.2 against 76.1. Galaxy A9 (2018) is an a lot older phone than the Samsung Galaxy A22, but it is a little thinner and just a little lighter anyway. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a lot better 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A22, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.