Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-07-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Galaxy A22, getting a score of 97.6 against 76.1. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Fold is an older and extremely heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A22, but Samsung managed to make it thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Fold features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A22, because it has a lot better 1536 x 2152px resolution, a bit bigger screen and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Fold takes clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a back camera with a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low light situations.
Galaxy Fold features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Fold counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.