Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 274 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A22, getting an 87.7 score against 76.1. Despite being the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy M51 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy M51 features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a little bit larger screen, a greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy M51 has a little bit more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A22, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a way higher video definition and a camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.