Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than Galaxy A22's general score of 76.1. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a little thinner than Galaxy A22, but it is somewhat heavier and was released just 11 months before.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a quite larger display, a much better pixel count per inch in the screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.