Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A22's 76.1 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is an noticeably older cellphone than the Galaxy A22, but it's a bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
Galaxy Note 5 has a way better display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and much more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A22 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs or video in low light environments and a camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A22 has much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.