Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A22, with an 80.4 score against 76.1. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition construction is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A22, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a better screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of screen and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A22. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.