Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is much better than Galaxy A22's 76.1 general score. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Galaxy Note10 Lite's body is older, just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A22.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a better count of pixels per inch of display, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.