Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A22's global score of 76.1. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note3 has 4.4.2 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12, giving lots of additional features. Galaxy Note3 is a a little lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A22, but they are equally thin.
The Galaxy Note3 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px. Galaxy A22 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A22 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A22 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note3 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited situations and a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.