Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a general score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22's 76.1 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note5 is extremely older than the Samsung Galaxy A22, it's body is just a little thinner and a bit lighter. Galaxy Note5 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better screen density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy Note5 features a bit better processor than Galaxy A22. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and video in low light situations and a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a very superior battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.