Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A22's overall score of 76.1. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A22. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a much higher display pixels density, a little larger screen and a lot better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.