Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A22's global score of 76.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A22.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A22, because it has a way greater screen pixel density, a little larger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy A22 has a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better battery duration than Galaxy A22. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.