Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy A22's global score of 76.1. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S5 Sport has a newer 4.4.2 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. Even though the Galaxy S5 Sport is much older and just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A22, it's body is still lighter.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A22, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (but faster) and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Galaxy S5 Sport has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way higher pixels count per inch in the display.
The Galaxy S5 Sport captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy A22 has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S5 Sport has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.