Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-02 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A22's 76.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's construction is much older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A22. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S8 Active has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a lot better pixels number per display inch. The Galaxy S8 Active shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy A22 features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A22 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.