Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 274 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A22, with a global score of 80.1 against 76.1. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Even though the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than the Galaxy A22, we must note that it's also older, much thicker and much heavier.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher display pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A22. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cores. The Galaxy A22 features a better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A22 also counts with a much more MP back camera.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.