Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A22's global score of 76.1. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Galaxy A22. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy A22. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 features a better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover Pro captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution and a worse (Full HD) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.