Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than Galaxy A22's global score of 76.1. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A22, even though it was released just a bit further than a year before. These phones come with the same Android 12 OS, so they should give identical OS features.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a bit larger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a lot better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a way better battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.