Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 274 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A22's overall score of 76.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A22, but it's much heavier and was released about 10 months before.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a much better 1768 x 2208 resolution, a larger display and a greater display density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A22. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a much worse resolution camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.