Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-07-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Mint, Violet and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 274 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A22's general score of 76.1. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version. Despite being the best device we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's design is older, heavier and just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A22.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A22, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit larger display and a greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A22 features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better resolution back camera and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.