Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G's general score of 71.9. Although the Apple iPhone X is noticeably older than the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, it's body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner. Apple iPhone X counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has 2 less processing cores and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a bit better screen pixel density. The Apple iPhone X has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G has a much longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh. IPhone X captures better photos and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a much less mega pixels back facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the iPhone X also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.