Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is much better than the Galaxy A23 5G's 71.9 overall score. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is older than Galaxy A23 5G, it's design is just a little thinner and incredibly lighter. Google Pixel 3 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with as much memory for games and applications as Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, both of them have equal internal memory. Google Pixel 3 features a lot better processing power than Galaxy A23 5G. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy A23 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.