Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-09-02 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G's overall score of 71.9. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G has Android 12 version. HTC One M9 is a older and somewhat thicker device than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, but HTC was able to build it extremely lighter anyway.
HTC One M9 features an extremely better processor than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a graphics processing unit. HTC One M9 counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels number in each inch in the display.
The HTC One M9 counts with slightly more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. HTC One M9 has a better camera than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and a camera in the back with much less megapixels, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A23 5G has a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 76 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.