Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than Galaxy A23 5G's score of 71.9. LG V35 ThinQ's design is lighter and thinner than the Galaxy A23 5G, although it was released 4 years before. LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater processing power than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. LG V35 ThinQ has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G has a very superior battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.