Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the Galaxy A23 5G's overall score of 71.9. Although the LG Velvet is incredibly older than Galaxy A23 5G, it's design is a little thinner and a little lighter. The LG Velvet has a very superior CPU than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a little larger display. LG Velvet takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
LG Velvet has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G has longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.