Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-02 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot better than the Galaxy A23 5G, having a score of 87 against 71.9. These devices include Android OS, but the Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while Galaxy A23 5G has Android 12 version. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is a bit thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy A23 5G, even though it was released about 23 months before.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, although it has a little smaller screen, a little worse pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a little lower 876 x 2142 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a back camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and a lot bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs. The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A23 5G counts with a much better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.