Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than the Galaxy A23 5G, having an 83.8 score against 71.9. Galaxy A50 is an extremely older device than Galaxy A23 5G, but it is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Galaxy A50 features a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A50 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density. Galaxy A50 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a much less megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A23 5G has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.