Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is much better than the Galaxy A23 5G, with an 86.6 score against 71.9. The Galaxy A50s is an way older cellphone than Galaxy A23 5G, but it's a bit thinner and lighter anyway. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Galaxy A23 5G has Android 12.
Galaxy A50s has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A50s features a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A50s has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A50s shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photographs or videos in low light environments and a lesser megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.