Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-02 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than Galaxy A23 5G's 71.9 overall score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Galaxy A23 5G has Android 12. The Galaxy A51 design is lighter and a bit thinner than Galaxy A23 5G, even though it was released 3 years before.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each display inch.
The Galaxy A51 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A23 5G has improved battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.