Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-09-02 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Galaxy A23 5G, getting a score of 91.3 against 71.9. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 12 OS (operating system), so they should provide identical operating system features. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A23 5G, but it's a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better display than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a little greater screen pixel density.
Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a much more megapixels camera in the back. Galaxy A52 5G counts with much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
Galaxy A23 5G features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.