Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-09-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, with a 79.3 score against 71.9. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy A23 5G has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 body is just a bit thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, although it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note 5's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as Galaxy A23 5G's one, both of them have the same internal storage.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a lot better processing power than Galaxy A23 5G, although it has 7 less CPU cores (but faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM. The Galaxy A23 5G features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video and a much lower 16 mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.