Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is much better than the Galaxy A23 5G's score of 71.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better cellphone than the Galaxy A23 5G, it must be noted that it is also a lot older, heavier and just a little thicker. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while Galaxy A23 5G has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better looking display than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better performing processor than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Galaxy A23 5G and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.