Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-02 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is better than Galaxy A23 5G, having an 81.7 score against 71.9. Although the Galaxy S8 is older than the Galaxy A23 5G, it's body is just a bit thinner and way lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S8 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. Galaxy S8 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
Galaxy S8 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S8 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy A23 5G features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.