Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-02 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than Galaxy A23 5G's 71.9 global score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has older 10 version while Galaxy A23 5G has Android 12 version. Despite being the best in this comparison review, we must note that it is also noticeably older, a little thicker and heavier.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A23 5G has a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.