Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is much better than Galaxy A23 5G's 71.9 overall score. Although it's the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design is noticeably older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than Galaxy A23 5G. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Galaxy A23 5G has Android 12.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery duration is just as good as Galaxy A23 5G's battery life, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.